XEQT vs VFV: which ETF is better?
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) compared on fees, holdings overlap, dividend yield, returns and risk, using the latest data.
- XEQT and VFV have moderate overlap: 40% of each fund by weight sits in the same holdings.
- VFV is cheaper at 0.08% a year against 0.19% for XEQT, about C$11 less in fees per C$10,000 invested each year.
- Over the last 5 years, VFV returned an average of 13.5% a year against 12.1% for XEQT, with dividends reinvested.
- XEQT is more diversified, with 7,388 holdings against 505 in VFV.
- XEQT pays more income, yielding 1.63% over the last 12 months against 0.88% for VFV.
- Overlap by weight
- 39.5%
- Shared holdings
- 501
| XEQT | VFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF |
| Issuer | IShares | Vanguard |
| Listed on | Toronto Stock Exchange · CAD | Toronto Stock Exchange · CAD |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| Assets (AUM) | C$23.5B | C$35.9B |
| Launched | Aug 7, 2019 | Nov 2, 2012 |
| Holdings | 7,388 | 505 |
| Dividend yield (12m) | 1.63% · quarterly | 0.88% · quarterly |
| Asset class | Multi-Asset | Equity |
| Annualised return | XEQT | VFV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +14.2% | +10.9% |
| 3 years | +21.6% | +21.6% |
| 5 years | +12.1% | +13.5% |
| 10 years | — | +15.6% |
| Volatility | 12.9% | 14.7% |
| Max drawdown | -29.8% | -27.4% |
Volatility is the annualised standard deviation of daily returns over 3 years. Max drawdown is the largest fall from a peak over the last 10 years, or since launch.
| Holding | XEQT | VFV |
|---|---|---|
| AAPLAPPLE | 3.13% | 7.38% |
| NVDANVIDIA | 2.75% | 8.39% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 2.49% | 5.78% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 1.60% | 3.71% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 1.03% | 3.07% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 0.87% | 2.54% |
| GOOGALPHABET CLASS C | 0.84% | 2.45% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 0.83% | 2.43% |
| LLYELI LILLY | 0.68% | 1.41% |
| BRK-BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 0.67% | 1.41% |
Pull each fund's details, full price history and holdings into Google Sheets or Excel, so your comparison updates itself.
=SF("XEQT.TO","etfInfo","expenseRatio&assetsUnderManagement&holdingsCount")=SF_TIMESERIES("XEQT.TO","2019-08-01",TODAY(),"dailyAdj")=SF("VFV.TO","etfInfo","expenseRatio&assetsUnderManagement&holdingsCount")=SF_TIMESERIES("VFV.TO","2019-08-01",TODAY(),"dailyAdj")Prices to Nov 6, 2026; holdings last checked Nov 6, 2026. Returns are in each fund's trading currency (CAD). Past performance doesn't predict future returns. For information only, not investment advice.
More comparisons
XEQT vs VFV: frequently asked questions
How much do XEQT and VFV overlap?
39.5% by weight. They share 501 holdings, and that share of each fund is invested in exactly the same positions. They cover quite different parts of the market.
Is XEQT or VFV cheaper?
VFV is cheaper. XEQT's expense ratio is 0.19% a year and VFV's is 0.08%, so on C$10,000 you'd pay about C$19 and C$8 a year.
Which has performed better, XEQT or VFV?
Over the last 5 years, VFV has. XEQT returned 12.1% and VFV 13.5% a year on average, including reinvested dividends, as of Nov 6, 2026. Past returns don't predict future ones.
Which pays a higher dividend, XEQT or VFV?
XEQT does. Over the last 12 months XEQT yielded 1.63%, paid quarterly, and VFV 0.88%, paid quarterly.
Should I hold both XEQT and VFV?
They overlap by 40%, so holding both does spread your money more widely than either alone. Whether that suits you depends on the mix you want. This is general information, not advice.
Build your own fund comparison that updates itself
SheetsFinance pulls prices, dividends, ETF holdings and fund details for 80,000+ assets straight into Google Sheets and Excel.