VWRP vs VUAG: which ETF is better?
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG) compared on fees, holdings overlap, dividend yield, returns and risk, using the latest data.
- VWRP and VUAG have high overlap: 61% of each fund by weight sits in the same holdings.
- VUAG is cheaper at 0.07% a year against 0.14% for VWRP, about £7 less in fees per £10,000 invested each year.
- Over the last 5 years, VUAG returned an average of 11.1% a year against 9.5% for VWRP, with dividends reinvested.
- VWRP is more diversified, with 3,642 holdings against 504 in VUAG.
- Overlap by weight
- 60.6%
- Shared holdings
- 431
| VWRP | VUAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Listed on | London Stock Exchange · GBP | London Stock Exchange · GBP |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| Assets (AUM) | £66.3B | £66.7B |
| Launched | Jul 23, 2019 | May 14, 2019 |
| Holdings | 3,642 | 504 |
| Dividend yield (12m) | 0.00% | 0.00% · quarterly |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Annualised return | VWRP | VUAG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +9.6% | +9.3% |
| 3 years | +16.7% | +17.6% |
| 5 years | +9.5% | +11.1% |
| 10 years | — | — |
| Volatility | 11.8% | 13.1% |
| Max drawdown | -25.1% | -25.6% |
Volatility is the annualised standard deviation of daily returns over 3 years. Max drawdown is the largest fall from a peak over the last 10 years, or since launch.
| Holding | VWRP | VUAG |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.03% | 8.39% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.54% | 7.38% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.60% | 5.78% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 2.28% | 3.71% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.92% | 3.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.54% | 2.54% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.50% | 2.43% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.50% | 2.46% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 1.13% | 1.83% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.98% | 1.52% |
Pull each fund's details, full price history and holdings into Google Sheets or Excel, so your comparison updates itself.
=SF("VWRP.L","etfInfo","expenseRatio&assetsUnderManagement&holdingsCount")=SF_TIMESERIES("VWRP.L","2019-07-01",TODAY(),"dailyAdj")=SF("VUAG.L","etfInfo","expenseRatio&assetsUnderManagement&holdingsCount")=SF_TIMESERIES("VUAG.L","2019-07-01",TODAY(),"dailyAdj")Prices to Nov 6, 2026; holdings last checked Nov 8, 2026. Returns are in each fund's trading currency (GBP). Past performance doesn't predict future returns. For information only, not investment advice.
More comparisons
VWRP vs VUAG: frequently asked questions
How much do VWRP and VUAG overlap?
60.6% by weight. They share 431 holdings, and that share of each fund is invested in exactly the same positions. They share a large core but each adds something the other doesn't.
Is VWRP or VUAG cheaper?
VUAG is cheaper. VWRP's expense ratio is 0.14% a year and VUAG's is 0.07%, so on £10,000 you'd pay about £14 and £7 a year.
Which has performed better, VWRP or VUAG?
Over the last 5 years, VUAG has. VWRP returned 9.5% and VUAG 11.1% a year on average, including reinvested dividends, as of Nov 6, 2026. Past returns don't predict future ones.
Which pays a higher dividend, VWRP or VUAG?
Neither: they yield the same. Over the last 12 months VWRP yielded 0.00%, and VUAG 0.00%, paid quarterly.
Should I hold both VWRP and VUAG?
They overlap by 61%, so holding both does spread your money more widely than either alone. Whether that suits you depends on the mix you want. This is general information, not advice.
Build your own fund comparison that updates itself
SheetsFinance pulls prices, dividends, ETF holdings and fund details for 80,000+ assets straight into Google Sheets and Excel.